Dane Propoggia vs Adam Feeney Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L W L L L L L
Form
L W W W L W W L L LHead-2-Head: Propoggia 2 - 1 Feeney
They have played 9 sets in total, with Propoggia winning 5 and Feeney winning 4. The last match between Propoggia and Feeney was at the Burnie Challenger, 30-01-2012, Q3, Hard with Adam Feeney getting the victory 6-2 3-6 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Dane Propoggia | 2 |
| Adam Feeney | 1 |
Burnie Challenger(30-01-2012)
6
2
3
6
6
3
| Propoggia | Stats | Feeney |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 295 | Highest Rank | 248 |
| 35 | Age | 40 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 3 | Titles | 6 |
| 56% (235-182) | Career Total W/L | 56% (292-233) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $15,265 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Draper VS Berrettini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Keys VS Vekic PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
28 Apr 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 3-6 6-3 | |||||
| 6-4 3-6 6-4 | |||||
| 7-6(3) 3-6 6-3 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 5 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 42 | Games Won | 44 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 67% (2/3) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Dane Propoggia Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Karlo Kranic
Player
Dane Propoggia
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fran Zvonimir Zgombic
Player
Dane Propoggia
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
12
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomislav Jotovski
Player
Dane Propoggia
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harry Bourchier
Player
Dane Propoggia
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
62%
(
23 of
37)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
50
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dayne Kelly
Player
Dane Propoggia
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
9
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dane Propoggia
Player
Thomas Fancutt
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
6
Aces
15
5
Double Faults
2
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
20 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Liam Caruana
Player
Dane Propoggia
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dane Propoggia
Player
Alexander Babanine
53%
(
41 of
77)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
36%
(
13 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Mitchell
Player
Dane Propoggia
80%
(
55 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
8
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
view more
Adam Feeney Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Bumpei Sato
Player
Adam Feeney
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
9
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrew Whittington
Player
Adam Feeney
52%
(
37 of
71)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
13
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| SF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-2 4-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (235/182) | Win/Loss | 56% (292/233) |
| 55% (524/428) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (670/536) |
| 52% (4649/4228) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (6008/5391) |
| 55% (160/129) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (229/167) |
| 59% (54/38) | Clay Win/Loss | 46% (25/29) |
| 65% (11/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 41% (12/17) |
| 53% (10/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 57% (26/20) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 447 | Aces Total | 161 |
| 0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.05 |
| 419 | Total Double Faults | 256 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 582.09 | Average Opponent Rank | 484.44 |
| 60% (4576/7675) | 1st Serve % | 64% (2097/3279) |
| 69% (3145/4576) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (1413/2097) |
| 48% (1500/3099) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (510/1182) |
| 43% (286/668) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (111/262) |
| 38% (2810/7461) | Return Points Win % | 37% (1140/3043) |
| 50% (2/2) | Slam W/L | 20% (2/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/3) | Main Tour W/L | 40% (8/12) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (53/51) | Challenger W/L | 47% (72/82) |
| 59% (180/126) | Futures W/L | 62% (210/131) |
| 56% (230/412) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (284/512) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 60% (3/5) |
| 49% (59/120) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (79/164) |
| 52% (63/121) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (70/159) |
| 86% (233/201) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (309/259) |
| 14% (233/32) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (309/49) |
| 17% (184/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (216/33) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
